Tuesday 20 November 2012

121120

Posted Tuesday 20th November 2012 05:26 GMT amanfromMars 1 …… asking a simple question on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/3/2012/11/19/the_virus_that_ate_the_bbc/

Immoral or Indecently Unusually Kind and Necessary?
Perhaps you are confusing the 2 things. Just because it's immoral to condition an audience does not mean that it's not possible. ....  James Micallef Posted Monday 19th November 2012 12:50 GMT
In a world/worlds of neanderthal primitives, who have nary a clue about what really is going on and shaping their future lives, is it criminal to not change the manic mayhem with conflicting chaotic psychotic episodes or is the knowledge of how things are and how they are phormed to be, to be an overwhelming advantage to be exclusively and jealously milked and bilked for all IT is worth, for fabulous obscene personal gain whenever one recognises the ease of the exercise and the ignorance of the non existent opposition and competition? Yes, I can understand how that can seem not unattractive, however .......

Methinks ...... Our mission. To enrich people's lives with programmes and services that inform, educate and entertain, and with vision, to be the most creative organisation in the world.. ..... is much the greater money spinner and an infinitely more powerful program for Global Cyber Command and Remote Virtual Control Centre Controllers ....... SMARTR IntelAIgent Media Director Generals.

Which begs the question of the BBC ....... Are they into Global Cyber Command and Remote Virtual Control with Central Control and SMARTR IntelAIgent Media Director Generalship ...... for that is what is freely available to Humanity and Animals in the Field today ...... and to other wannabe Brilliant Brainwashing Corporations too, of course.

Hi, RT/Al Jazeera/Channel 4.
......

Posted Tuesday 19th November 2012 05:46 GMT amanfromMars 1 ….. musing on http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/3/2012/11/19/the_virus_that_ate_the_bbc/

Re: Unfortunately change is needed

And what is one to make of Lord McAlpine's rush to capitalise on the ignorance of fools who speculate in titillation to brighten their sad and dreary lives? Unnecessarily vindictive or a fair response which would be mimicked by all [although having already possession of and/or ready access to pots of cash might be a pre-requisite too far in that for all but the most wealthy and well connected]?
..........................................................................................................................................................

No comments: